_HeroTeaser

What do you do when you're designing for a surgical robot, where UX decisions can be the difference between life and death?

You tackle 5 stakeholder groups, cross-check your design against all 140 FMEA hazard cases, and align with the business timeline all at the same time...

…because incomplete design thinking means no regulatory approval, no Series A, and ultimately no way to help surgeons save lives.

_Context
Revolve Surgical

Architecting a unified product vision for a medical startup's surgical robot, enabling Series A positioning and confident market launch.

Revolve Surgical's system represented years of iterative engineering refinement, evolving from a concept no larger than a desk lamp into a sophisticated 1-metre-tall robotic system as requirements accumulated. But as the device grew in complexity, maintaining a coherent product vision became increasingly challenging.

To succeed in bringing an affordable, general-purpose surgical robot to market, Revolve needed to synthesize market positioning, user requirements, and regulatory constraints into a single, compelling product vision that could guide development decisions and communicate value to investors, clients, and surgeon users alike.

Role

I was the sole product designer on the team, working closely with the Product Lead and collaborating directly with the CEO, CTO, and cross-functional team of 8.

Skills

0-1 product strategy, market research, stakeholder alignment

Year

2023—2024

_Outcome01

I established product design strategy by integrating diverse technical, regulatory, and user requirements into a coherent design framework, delivering a unified product vision that aligned the entire cross-functional team including the CEO & CTO.

When stakeholders express seemingly opposing needs, there's usually a deeper pattern worth excavating.

At Revolve, they looked like this:

_ConstraintHell
Users

"We're only really interested if it looks sleek and like an Apple product. Don't make it look crude or cheap."

Business

"We need to differentiate from our competitors...who all take design cues from Apple."

Engineering

"Simple geometric forms are necessary to ease CAD and manufacturing processes."

Hospitals

"We'd rather your device be easy to clean and wipe down, and also look kind of plain to blend into the OR."

What initially appeared as competing priorities revealed a deeper pattern: every group was expressing the same core need for quality reassurance through different lenses.
This insight unlocked the solution: rather than compromising between different design approaches, I could draw from the design philosophy that actually created the “Apple look”: mid-century functionalism and Gute Form principles.
_HistoryofDesign
Design systems
Systemic approach to design for repeatability and scalability
Apple
Classic iPod, calculator app, aesthetic based off Braun design
Jonathan Ive
Said that the work of Dieter Rams is "beyond improvement"
IDEO
Founded by designers influenced by Modernist design thinking
Neilson UX Heuristics
Concepts of "less, but better" and user-oriented design principles derived from Stanford School
Braun
Progenitor of form-follows-function ethos of modern consumer product design
Dieter Rams
Godfather of Silicon Valley template of UX design minimalism, and creator of the Ten Principles of Good Design
Ulm School of Design
Established the foundations of what we now call "design thinking" and user-centric, interdisciplinary problem-solving
Otl Aicher
Work at Lufthansa and 1972 Olympics is the template every modern design system is based off of
Drawing from mid-century influences created a shared design language the entire engineering-driven team could understand and execute on: systematic principles rather than subjective aesthetics.
It transformed our market positioning challenge into a competitive advantage, giving us a strategically-informed product direction that aligned all stakeholder needs.
_Designstrategy
Revolve Design Philosophy
Adopting mid-century functionalist principles unlocked the conflicting constraints and solved for all of them at once.
Users

Attractive appearance that easily communicates affordances and a sense of functional quality.

Business

Differentiates from competitors and communicates product positioning as affordable and general-purpose.

Engineering

Simple, geometric forms that enable easy draughting and prototyping of device iterations.

Hospitals

Integrates well into OR environment and easy to maintain and sterilise.

_Outcome02

I enabled Revolve's multi-device deployment vision by developing a hierarchical status indicator system, enabling multiple OR staff to efficiently monitor multiple devices concurrently.

The OR presented a complex information architecture challenge: multiple devices, multiple staffers and users, and a high-stakes, high-stress situation.

Key to success was understanding the behaviour of our specialist users: the laparoscopic procedure meant operators focused on monitor feeds rather than the surgical table itself.

One key innovation: a primary status indicator within the general monitor viewing area up on the device’s “mast”, while detailed diagnostics remained accessible but unobtrusive near table level.
Typical vision area
The mast indicator innovation was one part of multiple, exhaustive rounds of thorough systemic mapping of the Revolve device's information architecture, cross-checking user behaviours with opportunities to improve product safety and regulatory compliance.
The indicator hierarchy system enabled efficient triage in high-stress environments, and would vastly scale the capabilities of surgeons and their assistive staff in operating environments.
_Outcome03

I guided safe user behaviour and ensured regulatory compliance by applying the new design strategy, creating a systematic visual language that communicated device affordances and informed best handling practises.

With a design approach established, it was now a matter of fleshing out the details. I needed to develop a design system that addressed each of the stakeholder requirements, and our FMEA matrix of 140 hazard cases required every design decision be made to prevent possible injury or death.

I developed a systematic, three-tier material hierarchy that encoded safety and user requirements directly into the visual language based off of practises for developing digital design systems.
_Levelsdesign
Level 1
General device housing

Light metallic grey with sandblasted appearance.

Hospitals: Easy surface to sterilise and embodies professional medical appearance.

▲ Always nested within ▲
Level 2
Touch surfaces

Black, matte, textured appearance.

Safety: Guides proper handling behaviours and reinforces ideal operational practises.

▲ Always nested within ▲
Level 3
Control elements

White with coloured accents matching brand colours.

Users: Clear indication of affordances and control points.

The nested light-dark-light contrast ensured visibility across OR lighting conditions. Form language reinforced material cues: curved surfaces invited touch, hard edges discouraged contact.

This systematic approach transformed 140 regulatory constraints from design limitations into the foundation of visual coherence, ensuring every aesthetic choice served both usability and life-critical safety requirements.

By Q3 2024, Revolve was presenting the system at major medical trade shows, demonstrating the market confidence enabled by having a unified product vision.

Overhead view of of twinned Revolve Surgical System over an operating bed

The comprehensive product vision enabled Revolve to confidently articulate their value proposition to investors and partners, supporting their transition from stealth to public launch.

By providing clear design direction for a first production-ready unit and investor materials, the framework positioned the company for Series A preparation while enabling immediate trade show exhibitions and regulatory milestone achievement.

Thanks for checking out my stories.
Let's do excellent work together.